Methodology for literature reviews undertaken by the EdTech Hub

EPPI-Centre Core Keywording Strategy. (2001). [Guideline tools for keywording and data extraction]. EPPI-Centre. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=184#Guidelines

EPPI-Centre Guidelines for extracting data and quality assessing primary studies in educational research. (2003). [Guideline tools for keywording and data extraction]. EPPI-Centre. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=184#Guidelines

PRISMA 2009 flow diagram. (2009). PRISMA. http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA%202009%20flow%20diagram.doc

Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 432–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12102

de Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Jordan, K., Martin, K., Murphy, M., & Walker, H. (2019). Country list with HDI, iHDI, MPI and Gini (version 1) (Research Instrument No. 08–2). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3346903

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Jordan, K., Martin, K., Murphy, M., & Walker, H. (2019). Keyword inventory (version 1) (Working Paper - Research Instrument No. 08–1). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3523935

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Jordan, K., Martin, K., Murphy, M., & Walker, H. (2019). Literature reviews of educational technology research in low and middle-income countries: an audit of the field (Working Paper No. 2). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3523943

Haßler, B., & et al. (2020). Technical and Vocational Education and Training in Sub-Saharan Africa A Systematic Review of the Research Landscape (Berufsbildung in SSA). VET Repository, Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bonn, Germany.

Haßler, B., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Simpson, L., Carter, A., Kalifa Damani, Gill Francis, Katy Jordan, Nora McIntyre, & Joel Mitchell. (2019). Systemic Mixed-Methods Research — a conceptual framework for EdTech research along the IDIA scale (Working Paper No. 1). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3595482

Haßler, B., Stock, I., Schaffer, J., Winkler, E., Kagambèga, A., Haseloff, G., Marsden, M., Watson, J., Gordon, R., & Damani, K. (2019). Berufsbildung in Sub-Sahara Afrika: Stand der Forschung (10.5281/zenodo.3334690;2317526:XAXNF68P;2339240:GVETNP2S;2405685:6QK46DKT; Berufsbildung in SSA). VET Repository, Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3334690

Hennessy, S., Jordan, K., Haßler, B., Hollow, D., Brugha, M., Jamieson Eberhardt, M., & Sabates, R. (2020). Problem Analysis. A Global Public Good produced by the EdTech Hub (https://EdTechhub.org, #EdTechHub). (Working Paper No. 5). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3352007

Jimenez, E., Waddington, H., Goel, N., Prost, A., & Pullin, A. (2018). Mixing and Matching: Using Qualitative Methods to Improve Quantitative Impact Evaluations (IEs) and Systematic Reviews (SRs) of Development Outcomes (CEDIL-Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning, p. 32) [Working paper]. https://cedilprogramme.org/mixing-matching-using-qualitative-methods-quantitative-impact-evaluations/

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical report, EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01. https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~norsaremah/2007%20Guidelines%20for%20performing%20SLR%20in%20SE%20v2.3.pdf

Moher, D., Liberati, A., & Altman, D. (2009). PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PLoS Med, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Muyoya, C., Brugha, M., & Hollow, D. (2016). Education Technology Map: Guidance Document. Jigsaw Consult. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/58ff5610ed915d06ac00023b/A1541_HEART_report-Education_technology_evidence_FINAL.pdf

Tripney, J. S., & Hombrados, J. G. (2013). Technical and vocational education and training (TVET) for young people in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 5(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1877-6345-5-3

Waddington, H., Masset, E., & Jimenez, E. (2018). What have we learned after ten years of systematic reviews in international development? Journal of Development Effectiveness, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2018.1441166

Waddington, H., White, H., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J. G., Vojtkova, M., Davies, P., Bhavsar, A., Eyers, J., Koehlmoos, T. P., Petticrew, M., Valentine, J. C., & Tugwell, P. (2012). How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 359–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711765

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X17723971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971