Syṡtemic Mixed-Methods Research — a conceptual framework for scalable EdTech research

Cochrane Reviews | Cochrane Library. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://www.cochranelibrary.com/

Early Years Toolkit. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/early-years-toolkit

Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team | Home. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://www.hotosm.org/

Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D). (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://zenodo.org/communities/roer4d

Welcome - Humanitarian Data Exchange. (n.d.). Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://data.humdata.org/

Adam, T., Chuang, R., & Haßler, B. (2021). Structured Pedagogy and EdTech. EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4460344

Allier-Gagneur, Z., McBurnie, C., Chuang, R., & Haßler, B. (2020). Characteristics of effective teacher education in low- and middle-income countries: What are they and what role can EdTech play? (Helpdesk Response No. 10B). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0007

AllTrials. (n.d.). All Trials Registered. All Results Reported. AllTrials. Retrieved May 9, 2021, from https://www.alltrials.net/

Angrist, N., Evans, D. K., Filmer, D., Glennerster, R., Rogers, F. H., & Sabarwal, S. (2020). How to Improve Education Outcomes Most Efficiently? A Comparison of 150 Interventions Using the New Learning-Adjusted Years of Schooling Metric (Working Paper No. 9450; Policy Research Working Papers, p. 48). The World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/1813-9450-9450

Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44(2015), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

Assidmi, L. (2015). Education Dynamics: A Systems Thinking Perspective. 2015 Fifth International Conference on E-Learning (Econf), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECONF.2015.29

Bakker, A. (2018). Design Research in Education: A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers. Routledge.

Bamberger, M. (2012). Introduction To Mixed Methods In Impact Evaluation. https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/resources/guides/intro_mixed-methods_impact-evaluation

Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: a methodological toolkit for engineering change. In Handbook of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2). https://sashabarab.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ch-8-Cambridge-Handbook-of-the-Learning-Sciences.pdf

Barends, H. (2019). Elements Shaping the South African Education System of the Future. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3370973

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press.

Chang, A. M. (2018). Lean Impact: How to Innovate for Radically Greater Social Good (1 edition). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Lean+Impact%3A+How+to+Innovate+for+Radically+Greater+Social+Good-p-9781119506645

Chen, G. K. (1975). What is the systems approach? Interfaces, 6(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.6.1.32

DFID. (2011). DFID Ethics Principles for Research and Evaluation. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67483/dfid-ethics-prcpls-rsrch-eval.pdf

DFID. (2013). DFID Research Open and Enhanced Access - Implementation Guide (v1.1). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181177/DFIDResearch-Open-and-Enhanced-Access-Implementation-Guide.pdf

DFID. (2013). DFID Research Open and Enhanced Access Policy (v1.1) (p. 19). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181176/DFIDResearch-Open-and-Enhanced-Access-Policy.pdf

Education Endowment Foundation. (2020). Teaching and Learning Toolkit. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit

Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(14), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311501415

Getenet, S. (2019). Using design-based research to bring partnership between researchers and practitioners. Educational Research, 61(4), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1677168

Gorard, S. (2007). Mixing methods is wrong: An everyday approach to educational justice. British Educational Research Association. London.

GOV.UK. (n.d.). Agile delivery - Service Manual - GOV.UK. UK Government. Retrieved August 15, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery

Grobbelaar, S. S., & Buys, A. J. (2005). A conceptual systems dynamics model of research and development activities in South Africa. The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.7166/16-2-169

Groff, J. S. (2013). Dynamic Systems Modeling in Educational System Design & Policy. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2.2.72-81

Hammond, M. (2019). What is an ecological approach and how can it assist in understanding ICT take-up? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12889

Hankivsky, O. (2012). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/46176

Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Giesbrecht, M., Fridkin, A., Rudrum, S., Ferlatte, O., & Clark, N. (2014). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x

Hankivsky, O., & Kapilashrami, A. (2020). Beyond sex and gender analysis: an intersectional view of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak and response [Policy Brief]. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/global-policy-institute/Policy-brief-COVID-19-and-intersectionality.pdf

Haßler, B. (2018). Global Public Goods: Example document for licensing and publishing documents. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1201612

Haßler, B. (2018). WRAHA: We Refugees Also Have Ambitions! - research design for an unsuccessful eCubed application. Open Development & Education.

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Blower, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Hennessy, S., Martin, K., Megha-Bongnkar, G., Murphy, M., Walker, H., & Walker, H. (2021). Methodology for literature reviews (Working Paper No. 10). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0002

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Blower, T., El-Serafy, Y., Kaye, T., Khalayleh, A., McBurnie, C., Megha-Bongnkar, G., & Regis, C. (2021). All Programmes Recorded, All Outputs Reported (Working Paper No. 25). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0050

Haßler, B., El-Serafy, Y., Khalayleh, A., & McBurnie, C. (2021). Syṡtemic Mixed-Methods Research — a conceptual framework for scalable EdTech research (Working Paper No. 9). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0001

Haßler, B., & Mays, T. (2014). Open Content. In The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (pp. 1–11). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs154

Hennessy, S., Jordan, K., Wagner, D. A., & EdTech Hub Team. (2021). Problem Analysis and Focus of EdTech Hub’s Work: Technology in Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (Working Paper No. 7). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332693

Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Paige, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2020). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.]. Cochrane. /handbook/current

Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Kokotsaki, D., Coleman, R., Major, L., & Coe, R. (2013). The Sutton Trust-Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit.

Johnson, J. J., Padilla, J., & Diallo, S. Y. (2018). The achievement gap phenomenon: a practical application of modeling & simulation. Proceedings of the Annual Simulation Symposium, 1–12.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come - R. Burke Johnson, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2004. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Joyce, K. E., & Cartwright, N. (2020). Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice: Predicting What Will Work Locally. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 1045–1082. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219866687

Kerwin, J. T., & Thornton, R. L. (2020). Making the Grade: The Sensitivity of Education Program Effectiveness to Input Choices and Outcome Measures. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00911

Kerwin, J., & Thornton, R. L. (2018). Making the Grade: The Sensitivity of Education Program Effectiveness to Input Choices and Outcome Measures. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3002723

Kingdon, G. G., Little, A., Aslam, M., Rawal, S., Moe, T., Patrinos, H., Beteille, T., Banerji, R., Parton, B., & Sharma, S. K. (2014). A rigorous review of the political economy of education systems in developing countries. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/305753/Political-economy-education-systems1.pdf

Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me?: the right of young children to participate in decisions affecting them. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522740.pdf

Lansdown, G. (2009). See me, hear me. A guide to using the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Save the Children. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/node/1947/pdf/1947.pdf

Lateral Economics. (2016). Permission granted: The economic value of data assets under alternative policy regimes | Price Discrimination | Demand. https://www.scribd.com/doc/309810679/Permission-granted-The-economic-value-of-data-assets-under-alternative-policy-regimes

Manyika, J., Chui, M., Groves, P., Farrell, D., Van Kuiken, S., & Almasi Doshi, E. (2013). Open Data: Unlocking Innovation and Performance with Liquid Information. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Open%20data%20Unlocking%20innovation%20and%20performance%20with%20liquid%20information/MGI_Open_data_FullReport_Oct2013.ashx

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Ministry of Basic and Senior Secondary Education. (2021). National policy on radical inclusion in schools. https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/en/2021/national-policy-radical-inclusion-schools-7147

Murphy, R. (2016). Innovation Education – What are innovation skills? How can we provide innovation learning through the education system? https://www.academia.edu/31025578/Innovation_Education_What_are_innovation_skills_How_can_we_provide_innovation_learning_through_the_education_system

Pasanen, T., & Barnett, I. (2019). Supporting adaptive management. 32.

Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2018). Teacher Professional Development around the World: The Gap between Evidence and Practice. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8572

Poth, C. N. (2018). Innovation in Mixed Methods Research: A Practical Guide to Integrative Thinking with Complexity. SAGE Publications Limited.

Ramalingam, B. (2013). Aid on the Edge of Chaos: Rethinking International Cooperation in a Complex World (Illustrated edition). Oxford University Press.

REF. (2019). Ref 2019: Panel Criteria and Working Methods. https://www.ref.ac.uk/media/1084/ref-2019_02-panel-criteria-and-working-methods.pdf

Sanchez, H. A., Wells, B., & Attridge, J. M. (2009). Using system dynamics to model student interest in science technology, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of The 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 18.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Minding our language: why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523

Symonds, J. E., & Gorard, S. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.483514

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE.

Vogel, I. (2012). Review of the use of ‘Theory of Change’ in international development. 86.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. https://books.google.com/books/about/Social_Network_Analysis.html?id=CAm2DpIqRUIC

Wilson-Grau, R. (2018). Outcome Harvesting: Principles, Steps, and Evaluation Applications.

World Bank, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, & BE2. (2020). Cost-effective approaches to improve global learning: What does recent evidence tell us are “Smart Buys” for improving learning in Low and Middle Income Countries? [Text/HTML]. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/719211603835247448/pdf/Cost-Effective-Approaches-to-Improve-Global-Learning-What-Does-Recent-Evidence-Tell-Us-Are-Smart-Buys-for-Improving-Learning-in-Low-and-Middle-Income-Countries.pdf