Item history (bjohas, Thu Jan 18 2024 22:07:39 GMT+0000 (GMT))

TY - JOUR
TI - The evolution of systematic evidence reviews: Past and future developments and their implications for policy analysis
AU - Lemire, Sebastian
AU - Peck, Laura R.
AU - Porowski, Allan
T2 - Politics & Policy
AB - Abstract

Evidence reviews are widely used to summarize findings from existing studies and, as such, are an important base for policy analysis. Over the past 50 years, three waves of evidence reviews have emerged: (1) the meta‐analysis wave, (2) the mixed‐methods synthesis wave, and (3) the core components wave. The present article first describes these waves and reflects on the benefits and limitations of each wave in the context of policy analysis. Informed by this historical account, the article then identifies and discusses three trends that are likely to influence future directions of evidence reviews: (1) using data science tools, (2) embedding an equity focus, and (3) translating research into practice. The concluding discussion connects these developments to public policy, identifying how evidence from systematic evidence reviews informs—or could better inform—policy decisions.

Related Articles

Nunes Silva, Carlos. 2012. “Policy and Evidence in a Partisan Age: The Great Disconnect—By Paul Gary Wyckoff.”
Politics & Policy
40(3): 541–43.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2012.00363.x
.

Sinclair, Thomas A. P. 2006. “Previewing Policy Sciences: Multiple Lenses and Segmented Visions.”
Politics & Policy
34(3): 481–504.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2006.00025.x
.

Smith‐Walter, Aaron, Holly L. Peterson, Michael D. Jones, and Ashley Nicole Reynolds Marshall. 2016. “Gun Stories: How Evidence Shapes Firearm Policy in the United States.”
Politics & Policy
44(6): 1053–88.
https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12187
.

,
La evolución de las revisiones sistemáticas de evidencia: Desarrollos pasados y futuros y sus implicaciones para el análisis de políticas
Las revisiones de evidencia se utilizan ampliamente para resumir los hallazgos de estudios existentes y, como tales, son un tipo importante de análisis de políticas. En los últimos 50 años, han surgido tres oleadas de revisiones de evidencia: (1) la oleada de metanálisis, (2) la oleada de síntesis de métodos mixtos y (3) la oleada de componentes centrales. El presente artículo primero describe estas oleadas y reflexiona sobre los beneficios y limitaciones de cada oleada en el contexto del análisis de políticas. Basado en este relato histórico, el artículo luego identifica y analiza tres tendencias que probablemente influirán en las direcciones futuras de las revisiones de evidencia: (1) usar herramientas de ciencia de datos, (2) incorporar un enfoque de equidad y (3) traducir la investigación a la práctica. La discusión final conecta estos desarrollos con la política pública, identificando cómo la evidencia de las revisiones sistemáticas de evidencia informa, o podría informar mejor, las decisiones de política.
,
系统性证据审查的演变:过去和未来的发展及其对政策分析的影响
证据审查被广泛用于总结现有研究结果，因此是一种重要的政策分析类型。过去50年里，出现了三次证据审查浪潮，即荟萃分析、混合方法综合、以及核心组分法。本文首先描述了这三种方法，并在政策分析情境下反思了每种方法的优势和局限性。根据这一历史叙述，本文随后识别并探讨了可能影响证据审查未来方向的三种趋势:(1)使用数据科学工具，(2)嵌入公平视角，(3)将研究转化为实践。结论将这些发展与公共政策相联系，识别了来自系统性证据审查的证据如何影响政策决策(或如何能更好地影响政策决策)。
DA - 2023/06//
PY - 2023
DO - 10.1111/polp.12532
DP - DOI.org (Crossref)
VL - 51
IS - 3
SP - 373
EP - 396
J2 - Politics & Policy
LA - en
SN - 1555-5623, 1747-1346
ST - The evolution of systematic evidence reviews
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12532
Y2 - 2023/11/28/12:34:18
KW - _TBC for use in LR
ER -

TY - JOUR
TI - The evolution of systematic evidence reviews: Past and future developments and their implications for policy analysis
AU - Lemire, Sebastian
AU - Peck, Laura R.
AU - Porowski, Allan
T2 - Politics & Policy
AB - Evidence reviews are widely used to summarize findings from existing studies and, as such, are an important base for policy analysis. Over the past 50 years, three waves of evidence reviews have emerged: (1) the meta-analysis wave, (2) the mixed-methods synthesis wave, and (3) the core components wave. The present article first describes these waves and reflects on the benefits and limitations of each wave in the context of policy analysis. Informed by this historical account, the article then identifies and discusses three trends that are likely to influence future directions of evidence reviews: (1) using data science tools, (2) embedding an equity focus, and (3) translating research into practice. The concluding discussion connects these developments to public policy, identifying how evidence from systematic evidence reviews informs—or could better inform—policy decisions. Related Articles Nunes Silva, Carlos. 2012. “Policy and Evidence in a Partisan Age: The Great Disconnect—By Paul Gary Wyckoff.” Politics & Policy 40(3): 541–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00363.x. Sinclair, Thomas A. P. 2006. “Previewing Policy Sciences: Multiple Lenses and Segmented Visions.” Politics & Policy 34(3): 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00025.x. Smith-Walter, Aaron, Holly L. Peterson, Michael D. Jones, and Ashley Nicole Reynolds Marshall. 2016. “Gun Stories: How Evidence Shapes Firearm Policy in the United States.” Politics & Policy 44(6): 1053–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12187.
DA - 2023///
PY - 2023
DO - 10.1111/polp.12532
DP - Wiley Online Library
VL - 51
IS - 3
SP - 373
EP - 396
LA - en
SN - 1747-1346
ST - The evolution of systematic evidence reviews
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/polp.12532
Y2 - 2024/01/18/22:07:17
L1 - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/polp.12532
L2 - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12532?saml_referrer
KW - análisis de políticas
KW - componentes básicos
KW - core components
KW - evidence review
KW - meta-analysis
KW - metanálisis
KW - métodos Mixtos
KW - mixed methods
KW - policy analysis
KW - research synthesis
KW - revisión de evidencia
KW - revisión sistemática
KW - síntesis de Investigación
KW - systematic review
KW - 政策分析
KW - 核心组分
KW - 混合方法
KW - 研究综合
KW - 系统性综述
KW - 荟萃分析
KW - 证据审查
ER -

group: 2486141

itemKey: U8BG8VRZ

itemKeyOld: KBTHBHWM

item.extra:

itemOLD.extra: _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/polp.12532