Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study
Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
- Moore, Gabriel (Author)
- Redman, Sally (Author)
- D’Este, Catherine (Author)
- Makkar, Steve (Author)
- Turner, Tari (Author)
Title
Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study
Abstract
Rapid reviews are increasingly being used to help policy makers access research in short time frames. A clear articulation of the review’s purpose, questions, scope, methods and reporting format is thought to improve the quality and generalisability of review findings. The aim of the study is to explore the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in improving the perceived clarity of rapid review proposals from the perspective of potential reviewers.
Publication
Systematic Reviews
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
23
Date
2017-01-28
Journal Abbr
Systematic Reviews
ISSN
2046-4053
Short Title
Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals?
Accessed
11/09/2024, 10:00
Library Catalogue
BioMed Central
Citation
Moore, G., Redman, S., D’Este, C., Makkar, S., & Turner, T. (2017). Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
Link to this record