Item history (Lfriese, Wed Sep 11 2024 12:46:06 GMT+0100 (British Summer Time))

TY - JOUR
TI - Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study
AU - Moore, Gabriel
AU - Redman, Sally
AU - D’Este, Catherine
AU - Makkar, Steve
AU - Turner, Tari
T2 - Systematic Reviews
AB - Rapid reviews are increasingly being used to help policy makers access research in short time frames. A clear articulation of the review’s purpose, questions, scope, methods and reporting format is thought to improve the quality and generalisability of review findings. The aim of the study is to explore the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in improving the perceived clarity of rapid review proposals from the perspective of potential reviewers.
DA - 2017/01/28/
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
DP - BioMed Central
VL - 6
IS - 1
SP - 23
J2 - Systematic Reviews
SN - 2046-4053
ST - Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals?
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
Y2 - 2024/09/11/10:00:51
L1 - https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
L2 - https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
KW - Commissioned rapid reviews
KW - Evidence summaries
KW - Knowledge brokering
KW - Knowledge synthesis
KW - Policy-relevant
KW - Rapid reviews
KW - Research utilisation
KW - Review literature as topic
ER -

TY - JOUR
TI - Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study
AU - Moore, Gabriel
AU - Redman, Sally
AU - D’Este, Catherine
AU - Makkar, Steve
AU - Turner, Tari
T2 - Systematic Reviews
AB - Rapid reviews are increasingly being used to help policy makers access research in short time frames. A clear articulation of the review’s purpose, questions, scope, methods and reporting format is thought to improve the quality and generalisability of review findings. The aim of the study is to explore the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in improving the perceived clarity of rapid review proposals from the perspective of potential reviewers.
DA - 2017/01/28/
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
DP - BioMed Central
VL - 6
IS - 1
SP - 23
J2 - Systematic Reviews
SN - 2046-4053
ST - Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals?
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
Y2 - 2024/09/11/11:33:56
L1 - https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
L2 - https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0
KW - Knowledge synthesis
KW - Research utilisation
KW - Commissioned rapid reviews
KW - Evidence summaries
KW - Knowledge brokering
KW - Policy-relevant
KW - Rapid reviews
KW - Review literature as topic
ER -

group: 2405685

itemKey: 5C8BDJSP

itemKeyOld: MN3YGHFN

item.extra:

itemOLD.extra:

Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study

Citations by Year

Citations by Country Focus

Citing Resources

Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study

Citations by Year

Citations by Country Focus

Citing Resources