TY - JOUR TI - Support provided for K-12 teachers teaching remotely with technology during emergencies: A systematic review AU - Crompton, Helen AU - Burke, Diane AU - Jordan, Katy AU - Wilson, Samuel T2 - Journal of Research on Technology in Education AB - Emergencies can cause disruption to education. This study is unique in providing the first empirical systematic review on teacher support for Emergency Remote Education (ERE) from 2010 to 2020. A total of 57 studies emerged from the PRISMA search. This mixed-method study used deductive and inductive iterative methods to examine the data. The data reveal teacher support strategies from across 50 different high and low-income countries. Few studies focused on a teacher’s subject and the age range taught. In the examination of professional development provided to prepare K-12 teachers to conduct ERE, eight codes emerged from the grounded coding as; 1) prior preparation, 2) understanding ERE, 3) needs analysis, 4) digital pedagogical strategies, 5) technology tools, 6) frameworks, 7) digital equity, and 8) mental wellness. DA - 2021/04/06/ PY - 2021 DO - 10.1080/15391523.2021.1899877 DP - Taylor and Francis+NEJM VL - 0 IS - 0 SP - 1 EP - 16 SN - 1539-1523 ST - Support provided for K-12 teachers teaching remotely with technology during emergencies UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1899877 Y2 - 2021/04/08/13:32:10 KW - COVID-19 KW - Teacher education KW - _EdTechHub_Output KW - _GS:indexed KW - _MELA_seen KW - ___working_potential_duplicate KW - _cover:analysis:nopdf KW - _r:CopiedFromEvLib KW - _yl:a KW - disasters KW - emergencies KW - emergency remote education KW - pandemic KW - remote education ER - TY - JOUR TI - Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education AU - Crompton, Helen AU - Burke, Diane AU - Jordan, Katy AU - Wilson, Samuel W. G. T2 - British Journal of Educational Technology AB - Emergency situations that cause damage to educational buildings or require the closure of schools due to unsafe health, environmental, or political conditions can be an unwelcomed interruption to education. Indeed, the recent COVID-19 pandemic created the largest disruption of education in history, affecting 94% of the world's student population. In emergencies, technology is often utilised as part of a crisis response protocol by continuing education using emergency remote education (ERE). The purpose of this study is to determine how technology has been used to continue K-12 learning remotely during an emergency. This systematic review included an aggregated and configurative synthesis to examine extant empirical work over eleven years, from January 2010 to December 2020. Following a rigorous, PRISMA selection process, 60 articles were included in the final analysis from 48 countries. Grounded coding of the strategies used for learning revealed the following categories: communication, delivery systems, student ERE readiness, partnerships, promoting student learning and engagement, and resources. Grounded coding of the technologies revealed that types of technologies used were divided into two major categories: Internet-based and non-Internet based, with the majority using Internet-based technologies. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The COVID-19 pandemic has caused school closures across the globe and prevented in-person school teaching. The rapid shift to distance education in schools can be conceptualised as ‘emergency remote education’ (ERE). Prior ERE research focused on bounded geographic locations where localised emergencies occurred. What this paper adds This provides the scholarly community with a unique systematic review of existing academic research on K-12 ERE implementation in emergencies. This provides aggregated data and analysis on the past 11 years of the types of emergencies, participants, subject domain, technologies used, and location information. This provides findings of the types of remote teaching strategies involving technology used to continue K-12 learning in emergency situations. This provides a set of recommendations on ERE for teachers, school leaders, policy makers, and funders. This provides researchers with a review of the field with identification of gaps and future research opportunities. Implications for practice and/or policy Recommendations regarding ERE are provided in this paper that will be of benefit to K-12 teachers, school leaders policymakers, and funders in the continuing COVID-19 pandemic and future emergencies. The research gaps highlighted in this paper, such as the lack of studies conducted in low and low middle-income countries, are presented with suggestions for much needed future research. This can lead to changes in practice and policy. DA - 2021/// PY - 2021 DO - 10.1111/bjet.13114 DP - Wiley Online Library LA - en SN - 1467-8535 ST - Learning with technology during emergencies UR - https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.13114 Y2 - 2021/05/25/19:07:09 KW - COVID-19 KW - _DOILIVE KW - _EdTechHub_Output KW - _MELA_seen KW - ___working_potential_duplicate KW - _yl:b KW - _zenodo:submitted KW - disasters KW - emergencies KW - emergency remote education KW - pandemic ER - TY - RPRT TI - EdTech and Emergency Remote Learning: A Systematic Review AU - Crompton, Helen AU - Burke, Diane AU - Jordan, Katy AU - Wilson, Sam AU - Nicolai, Susan AU - Myers, Christina AB - An output of the EdTech Hub, https://edtechhub.org DA - 2021/06/09/ PY - 2021 LA - en M3 - Systematic review PB - EdTech Hub KW - _DOILIVE KW - _EdTechHub_Output KW - _MELA_seen KW - _r:AddedByZotZen KW - _zenodo:submitted ER - TY - JOUR TI - Mobile learning and pedagogical opportunities: A configurative systematic review of PreK-12 research using the SAMR framework AU - Crompton, Helen AU - Burke, Diane T2 - Computers and Education AB - Scholars postulate that mobile devices can be used to transform learning. However, there is a paucity of evidence to determine if mobile learning is redefining learning or if these devices are being used to replicate past teaching practices. To fill this gap in scholarly understanding, this systematic review was conducted to examine studies from 2014 to 2019 involving mobile devices in PK-12 (2–18 years) learning. Technology use was coded using the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) framework. This framework was empirically extended and presented in this study. The data revealed unique findings, including the concerning discovery that while mobile technologies can and were used to transform learning in 54% of the studies, 46% of the time devices were used to replicate activities that can be conducted without technology. This has larger implications on school integration of mobile devices and whether these devices are being used to redefine learning to provide the most benefit to PK-12 students. DA - 2020/// PY - 2020 DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945 VL - 156 IS - June SP - 103945 EP - 103945 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103945 KW - Mlearning KW - Mobile learning KW - SAMR KW - Systematic review KW - Technology integration ER - TY - JOUR TI - Mobile learning and student cognition: A systematic review of PK-12 research using Bloom’s Taxonomy AU - Crompton, Helen AU - Burke, Diane AU - Lin, Yi-Ching T2 - British Journal of Educational Technology AB - The rise of mobile learning in schools during the past decade has led to promises about the power of mobile learning to extend and enhance student cognitive engagement. The purpose of this study was to examine trends to determine the cognitive level students are involved in within mobile learning activities. This systematic review involved an aggregated and configurative synthesis of PK-12 mobile learning studies from 2010 to 16 and used Bloom’s Taxonomy as a theoretical framework for categorizing the cognitive level of student activities. Major new findings include that students are involved in activities at all six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study shows that over 60% of researchers are developing activities that require high levels of cognitive processing, a large increase from past studies. Nonetheless, 40% are integrating mobile devices in ways that keep students working with minimal cognitive processing. In both elementary and secondary studies, there was a 40/60% split in the use of lower versus high level thinking opportunities. New findings show that mobile devices were integrated into science, mathematics, social studies, literacy, art and special education. Studies in science settings were the majority of the studies (40%), followed by literacy (24%). DA - 2019/// PY - 2019 DO - 10.1111/bjet.12674 DP - Wiley Online Library VL - 50 IS - 2 SP - 684 EP - 701 LA - en SN - 1467-8535 ST - Mobile learning and student cognition UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.12674 Y2 - 2019/07/18/14:01:15 KW - Reviewed ER -