Item history (bjohas, Sat Jan 18 2020 11:20:50 GMT+0000 (GMT))

TY - JOUR
TI - Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies
AU - Adams, Richard J.
AU - Smart, Palie
AU - Huff, Anne Sigismund
T2 - International Journal of Management Reviews
AB - This paper suggests how the ‘grey literature’, the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer-review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and organization studies (MOS). The authors clarify the possibilities by reviewing 140 systematic reviews published in academic and practitioner outlets to answer the following three questions: (i) Why is grey literature excluded from/included in systematic reviews in MOS? (ii) What types of grey material have been included in systematic reviews since guidelines for practice were first established in this discipline? (iii) How is the grey literature treated currently to advance management and organization scholarship and knowledge? This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence-based management.
DA - 2017/10/01/
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1111/ijmr.12102
DP - Wiley Online Library
VL - 19
IS - 4
SP - 432
EP - 454
LA - en
SN - 1468-2370
ST - Shades of Grey
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijmr.12102
AN - UA-98bfbd4a-6e50-4502-8310-d5fef7363a11;10/gdg6vq;2317526:EE2A296A;2405685:M3M5DWUL;10.1111/ijmr.12102;2339240:6B5Z24QU;2405685:J9DCDD5D
Y2 - 2018/05/07/15:15:42
KW - -FullBiblioUHMLgen
KW - -GeneralCitations
KW - -missingHU
KW - DL4D cited
KW - publicImportV1
ER -

TY - JOUR
TI - Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies
AU - Adams, Richard J.
AU - Smart, Palie
AU - Huff, Anne Sigismund
T2 - International Journal of Management Reviews
T3 - discard
AB - This paper suggests how the ‘grey literature’, the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer-review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and organization studies (MOS). The authors clarify the possibilities by reviewing 140 systematic reviews published in academic and practitioner outlets to answer the following three questions: (i) Why is grey literature excluded from/included in systematic reviews in MOS? (ii) What types of grey material have been included in systematic reviews since guidelines for practice were first established in this discipline? (iii) How is the grey literature treated currently to advance management and organization scholarship and knowledge? This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence-based management.
DA - 2017/10/01/
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1111/ijmr.12102
DP - Wiley Online Library
VL - 19
IS - 4
SP - 432
EP - 454
LA - en
SN - 1468-2370
ST - Shades of Grey
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijmr.12102
AN - UA-98bfbd4a-6e50-4502-8310-d5fef7363a11;10/gdg6vq;2317526:EE2A296A;10.1111/ijmr.12102;2339240:6B5Z24QU;2405685:J9DCDD5D
Y2 - 2018/05/07/15:15:42
KW - -FullBiblioUHMLgen
KW - -GeneralCitations
KW - -missingHU
KW - publicImportV1
KW - DL4D cited
ER -

group:	2405685
itemKey:	M3M5DWUL
itemKeyOld:	J9DCDD5D