Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done

RIS

Recommended format for most reference management software

BibTeX

Recommended format for BibTeX-specific software

Open in Zotero
View on zotero.org
Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
Title
Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done
Abstract
Systematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews – the next two should see much more.
Publication
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
232-235
Date
2013
Language
en
DOI
10.1111/jebm.12072
ISSN
1756-5391
Short Title
Systematic reviews
URL
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jebm.12072
Accessed
18/01/2024, 22:13
Library Catalogue
Wiley Online Library
Rights
© 2013 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Extra
_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jebm.12072
Citation
Adams, C. E., Polzmacher, S., & Wolff, A. (2013). Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 6(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12072
Link to this record
https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/ETRT67XD
Relations