Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done
Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
- Adams, Clive E (Author)
- Polzmacher, Stefanie (Author)
- Wolff, Annabelle (Author)
Title
Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done
Abstract
Systematic reviews are researches requiring great attention to detail. They may well necessitate considerable investment of effort to ensure relevant data are identified, extracted, synthesized, written up and disseminated. These tasks have already been greatly refined and, in some cases, simplified, by machines. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in machine-assisted production of reviews – the next two should see much more.
Publication
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
232-235
Date
2013
Language
en
ISSN
1756-5391
Short Title
Systematic reviews
Accessed
18/01/2024, 22:13
Library Catalogue
Wiley Online Library
Rights
© 2013 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
Extra
Citation
Adams, C. E., Polzmacher, S., & Wolff, A. (2013). Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 6(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12072
Link to this record
