Design Principles for Systematic Search Systems: A Holistic Synthesis of a Rigorous Multi-cycle Design Science Research Journey

Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
Title
Design Principles for Systematic Search Systems: A Holistic Synthesis of a Rigorous Multi-cycle Design Science Research Journey
Abstract
Rigorous systematic literature searches are often described as complex, error-prone and time-consuming because of a prevailing lack of adequate technological assistance. Nonetheless, one of the first steps when conducting a rigorous literature review is finding an appropriate literature sample. The quality of this literature sample is an important factor for the overall quality of the literature review. This article investigates how to design innovative IT systems that effectively facilitate systematic literature searches. Applying the design science research paradigm, the research method consists of multiple design cycles of artifact development, evaluation, and refinement. In doing so, six design principles are derived that intend to increase the comprehensiveness, precision, and reproducibility of systematic literature searches. The results could be helpful for research and practice. The derived design knowledge builds a foundation for future research on systematic search systems and enables new methodological contributions. The results could also guide the development of innovative search systems and features that, eventually, increase the quality and efficiency of information accumulation in different contexts.
Publication
Business & Information Systems Engineering
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
91-111
Date
2019-02-01
Journal Abbr
Bus Inf Syst Eng
Language
en
ISSN
1867-0202
Short Title
Design Principles for Systematic Search Systems
Accessed
19/01/2024, 22:25
Library Catalogue
Springer Link
Citation
Sturm, B., & Sunyaev, A. (2019). Design Principles for Systematic Search Systems: A Holistic Synthesis of a Rigorous Multi-cycle Design Science Research Journey. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0569-6