Full Library
Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality
Resource type
            Journal Article
        Author/contributor
                    - Bryman, Alan (Author)
Title
            Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality
        Abstract
            In this article it is shown that the paradigm wars that raged concerning the incompatibility of quantitative and qualitative research have largely subsided. In the process, discussions of epistemological and ontological issues have become less prominent. The peace that has broken out has proved to be more favourable to research combining quantitative and qualitative research than was the case during the paradigm wars. Drawing on interviews with social researchers who employ a mixed‐methods approach and on the literature, it is shown that a spirit of pragmatism with regard to combining quantitative and qualitative research prevails which encourages researchers to consider using mixed‐methods research when the research question is suited to it. However, the issue of which quality criteria should be employed in investigations combining quantitative and qualitative research has not been given a great deal of consideration. The author argues for a contingency approach, in which issues to do with quality are decided in relation to the nature of the study.
        Publication
            International Journal of Social Research Methodology
        Volume
            9
        Issue
            2
        Pages
            111-126
        Date
            April 1, 2006
        ISSN
            1364-5579
        Accessed
            05/11/2019, 12:19
        Library Catalogue
            Taylor and Francis+NEJM
        Extra
            shortDOI: 10/b8wtt2
        Citation
            Bryman, A. (2006). Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595280
Link to this record
            
        